AI-assisted summary
This side-by-side is generated from verified tool data (rating, pricing, free tier, integrations, adoption signals) using our editorial scoring framework. How we rank.
Head-to-Head
Activepieces vs Make (2026)
Activepieces
Freemium★ 4.3
Best for: self-host automation workflows to keep sensitive business data on-premises, build ai-augmented workflows combining automation with llm calls
Make
Freemium★ 4.6
Best for: process large datasets from spreadsheets through multi-step transformation workflows, build complex order fulfillment automation with conditional routing
Activepieces and Make are closely matched on the seven criteria below. Activepieces is rated 4.3/5 across 1,400 aggregate ratings; Make is rated 4.6/5 across 9,800. Pick by which feature gap matters most for your workflow.
Feature Comparison
Output Quality
Derived from aggregate ratings (1,400 vs 9,800).
Ease of Use
Estimated from free-tier availability and entry pricing.
Pricing Value
Activepieces: freemium. Make: $9/mo.
Free Tier
Activepieces: yes. Make: yes.
Feature Depth
Estimated from documented pros and use cases.
Integrations
9 integrations vs 5.
Adoption
User adoption proxy from aggregate review volume.
Verdict
This comparison is context-dependent. Activepieces scores 31.5/35 and Make scores 32/35. Choose based on your specific workflow needs.
Pick Activepieces
Pick Activepieces when its specific use cases (Self-host automation workflows to keep sensitive business data on-premises, Build AI-augmented workflows combining automation with LLM calls) match yours.
Pick Make
Pick Make when output quality is the priority (4.6 vs 4.3), and team adoption matters (9,800 ratings vs 1,400).