AI-assisted summary
This side-by-side is generated from verified tool data (rating, pricing, free tier, integrations, adoption signals) using our editorial scoring framework. How we rank.
Head-to-Head
Culture Amp vs Greenhouse (2026)
Culture Amp
Paid★ 4.6
Best for: enterprise hr teams running annual and pulse engagement surveys with benchmarking needs, chros reporting people analytics and culture metrics to boards and executive teams
Greenhouse
Paid★ 4.5
Best for: running structured hiring at mid-market and enterprise scale, building candidate pipelines before roles open via crm
Culture Amp and Greenhouse are closely matched on the seven criteria below. Culture Amp is rated 4.6/5 across 3,800 aggregate ratings; Greenhouse is rated 4.5/5 across 2,841. Pick by which feature gap matters most for your workflow.
Feature Comparison
Output Quality
Derived from aggregate ratings (3,800 vs 2,841).
Ease of Use
Estimated from free-tier availability and entry pricing.
Pricing Value
Culture Amp: $50/mo. Greenhouse: paid.
Free Tier
Culture Amp: no. Greenhouse: no.
Feature Depth
Estimated from documented pros and use cases.
Integrations
4 integrations vs 4.
Adoption
User adoption proxy from aggregate review volume.
Verdict
This comparison is context-dependent. Culture Amp scores 26/35 and Greenhouse scores 26/35. Choose based on your specific workflow needs.
Pick Culture Amp
Pick Culture Amp when its specific use cases (Enterprise HR teams running annual and pulse engagement surveys with benchmarking needs, CHROs reporting people analytics and culture metrics to boards and executive teams) match yours.
Pick Greenhouse
Pick Greenhouse when its specific use cases (Running structured hiring at mid-market and enterprise scale, Building candidate pipelines before roles open via CRM) match yours.